

Several
hypotheses on the birthplace of narghile must be taken into account. They
concern Europe, America, India, Persia and Africa. Those who try hard to
write the official history of tobacco mention an American origin for the
latter and a European one for the transmission of its use modes, as the
common pipe, the chibouque or even narghile. Such an argument states that
the Europeans would have taught Asian and African peoples how to smoke,
particularly through the pipe. A consequence is that cannabis would have
been inhaled, neither in Europe, nor in Africa, nor anywhere else, before
the arrival of tobacco.
The
hypothesis of an American origin arose from the crossing of speculations
on ways tobacco was used through gourds in America and from deep studies
as those conducted at the beginning of the century by a scholar named L.
Wiener. The latter asserted that tobacco smoking would have been imported
from America to Africa several centuries before the arrival of Europeans.
I. Van Sertima enriched such a contribution by endeavouring, in his turn,
to show that African men certainly lived in America before the discovery
of this last continent and brought to theirs smoking behaviours like the
use of pipes.
The
Indian (Asia) track lacks sources. So, here, let us restrict ourselves to
quote only two authors without proceeding with the discussion. J. A. Frank
freely asserts that "two thousand years before the discovery of tobacco,
it seems that a water pipe called Dhoom Netra, filled with aromatic and
medicinal herbs, and also very probably with drugs, was smoked". G.Gercek
states, without supporting facts, that narghile was born in India and that
the artefact benefited from the addition of innovative elements as the bowl
and the nozzle when it reached the Ottoman Empire.
The
Persian origin is particularly upheld by B.M. Du Toit through ethnographical
surveys in southern Africa. The researcher was interested in the origin
of dagga (cannabis) and repeatedly reports the use of the "dakka"
water pipe. From contemporary Iran, a researcher named Hasan Semsar ascribes
the invention of narghile to the "Persian genius", ex-nihilo,
without providing with more details on the emergence of such an innovation
in smoking manners.
The
possibility of an African origin for narghile has been submitted by specialists
as A. Dunhill and J.E. Philips. The first of both considers the "dakka"
water pipe used by the "Hottentots" (Khoikhoin), living in the
South of the continent, as the precursor of narghile. As for the second
scholar, his research was based on a detailed and technical discussion,
particularly about undertaken excavations and dating problems posed at Hyrax
Hill in Kenya, Sebanzi in Zambia, Engaruka in Tanzania and in other places
of the African continent.
To
sum up, the social use of narghile, on a large-scale, can be fixed as simultaneous
with the emergence of the public coffee-house and the adoption of tobacco.
Today, the hypotheses we have kept, on account of their pertinence and relevance,
ascribe a South African, Ethiopian or Persian origin to the pipe. A European
origin is also defended by historians of tobacco. These last ones consider
that narghile would be a form adopted by the American pipe in the Mediterranean
region, in Africa or in Asia, after the spreading of the latter by the Europeans
in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Should they continue in a systematic
way, the archaeological excavations undertaken here and there in southern
and oriental Africa throughout the twentieth century, could indeed come
up with the definitive evidence of the use of water pipes on this continent
well before the critical and symbolic threshold year 1600 represents for
the upholders of the European hypothesis. The case of this Ethiopian cave
where water pipe bowls were discovered, and where the smoked use of cannabis
in the fourteenth century has been confirmed by chemical methods, undoubtedly
constitutes a step forward.
From The Sacred Narghile site, courtesy of Rive magazine.